domingo, 26 de enero de 2020

January 27, 2020

KARCHER STAFF BLOG



______________________________________________________________________________
Kudos
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • Thank you Brad Ferstenou and Stephanie Rummler for all of your behind the scenes work with our Leadership students to make our Karcher Character Assemblies a success!  And thank you to all of the teachers who participated in the Family Feud against the students!  Stellar performance!  
  • Thank you to our ELA staff for creating a great testing environment for our students during their winter iReady diagnostic.  We appreciate that you take this seriously as the data provides us with great insight into our students understanding of the standards.  
  • Thank you to our Scheduling Committee for your work and collaboration on Friday afternoon!  The meeting was scheduled from 11:40-12:30 but staff stayed until 1:30-2:00!  We appreciate your care and concern for ensuring we think of everything when it comes to our schedule.  And, thank you for ensuring Dyer staff feel equally part of the process as well!  
  • Congrats to the following staff members for our dedication and years of service to BASD:  
    • Patti Tenhagen, Kris Thomsen, and Stacey Steeples for 15 years of service 
    • Scott Staude and Rod Stoughton for 20 years of service 
    • Hans Block for 30 years of service (Impressive!!!) 

Article this week:  Continuation from the last 2 weeks

Test Better, Teach Better

by W. James Popham

Chapter 1. The Links Between Testing and Teaching


Using Tests to Determine Students' Entry Status

In most instructional settings, teachers inherit a new crop of students each year, and more often than not, these teachers really don't know what sorts of capabilities the new students bring with them. Likewise, teachers looking ahead in their planning books to new topics or skills (weather systems, Homer's epics, multiplying fractions, group discussion skills, ability to work independently) frequently find they have only the roughest idea, usually based on the previous grade level's content standards, of their students' existing familiarity or interest in the upcoming topics or of their students' expertise in the upcoming skill areas. Knowing where students stand in relation to future content, both as a group and as individuals, is one of a teacher's most valuable tools in planning appropriate and engaging instruction. Therefore, it's an eminently sensible thing for teachers to get a fix on their students' entry status by pre-assessing them, usually using teacher-created tests to find out what sorts of skills, knowledge, or attitudes these students have. The more diagnostic a pretest is, the more illuminating it will be to the teacher.
You can use pretests to isolate the things your new students already know as well as the things you will need to teach them. If you are a middle school English teacher aspiring to have your 8th graders write gripping narrative essays, and you're certain that these 8th graders haven't seriously studied narrative essays during their earlier years in school, you could use a pre-assessment to help you determine whether your students possess important enabling subskills. Can they, for example, write sentences and paragraphs largely free of mechanical errors in spelling, punctuation, and word usage? If their pre-assessment results show that they already possess these enabling subskills, there's no need to re-teach such subskills. If the pre-assessment results show that your students' mastery of the mechanics of writing is modest, then you'll need to devote appropriate time to promoting such subskills before you move on.
This example brings up an important point. If you're using a classroom pretest chiefly to get a picture of what your students already can do regarding a particular content standard, you should always try to employ a pretest that covers the standard's key enabling subskills or bodies of knowledge. For instance, when I taught a speech class in high school, I always had my students deliver a two- to three-minute extemporaneous speech early in the term. I was looking particularly for the fundamentals—posture, eye contact, organization of content, introductions, conclusions, and avoidance time-fillers such as “uh” and “you know”—those things I knew students needed to master before they could work on refining their abilities as first-class public speakers. Those pretests helped me decide where I wanted to aim my early instruction, and it was always at the most serious weaknesses the students displayed during their “mini-orations.”

Using Tests to Determine How Long to Teach Something

One of the classes I taught in my early years on the “grown-up” side of the desk was 10th grade geography. Thanks to a blessed red geography textbook and my ability to read more rapidly than my 10th graders, I survived the experience (barely). I remember that one of my units was three-week focus on map projections and map skills, during which we explored the use of such map-types as Mercator and homolographic projections. Each year that I taught 10th grade geography, my three-week unit on maps was always precisely three weeks in length. I never altered the duration of the unit because, after all, I had originally estimated that it would take 15 days of teaching to stuff the designated content into my students' heads. Yes, I was instructionally naïve. Beginning teachers often are.
What I should have done instead was use some sort of “dipstick” assessment of students' map skills throughout that three-week period to give me a better idea of how long I really needed to keep teaching map skills to my 10th graders. I always gave my students a 30-item map skills exam at the end of the 3 weeks; I could easily have taken that exam and split it up into 15 microquizzes of 1 or 2 items each, and then randomly administered each of those microquizzes to different students at the end of, say, 2 weeks. Students would have needed only two or three minutes to complete their microquizzes.
This approach is a form of what's called item sampling, a manner of testing in which different students are asked to complete different subsamples of items from a test. It works quite well if a teacher is trying to get a fix on the status of an entire class. (Clearly, item sampling wouldn't permit sensible inferences about individual students because different students would be completing different microquizzes.) By reviewing the results of my item-sampled, en route assessment, I could have determined whether, at the end of only two weeks, my students had already learned enough from their meanderings through Mapland. Looking back, I suspect, we continued to mess with Mercators and homolographics well beyond what was necessary.
You can do something similar with your own students to help you decide how long to continue teaching toward a particular content standard. By using an occasional en route test (either item sampling or by giving the same, possibly shortened, test to all of your students), you can tell whether you need to keep banging away on a topic or can put your drumsticks away.
This kind of instructionally illuminating testing, sometimes referred to as formative assessment, is a particularly valuable tool today, when there's so much to fit into each school year. The time saved in an easily mastered unit can be time applied to other material that students have unexpected difficulty with. Flexible, en route test-guided instructional scheduling can allow your students to move on to fascinating application activities or delve more deeply into other content.

Instructionally Focused Testing Tips


  • Recognize that students' overt responses to educational tests allow teachers to make inferences about students' covert status.
  • Use tests to exemplify—and, thus, clarify—fuzzy statements of curricular aims.
  • Pre-assess any new group of students to identify those students' entry status. Also pre-assess students when they'll be encountering new skills and knowledge to be learned.
  • Use test results to determine how much instruction on a given topic your students need.
  • Include the data generated by educational tests in evaluations of your own instructional effectiveness.

_______________________________________________________
Information/Reminders
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


New Construction Information 
  • Click HERE to access the new building blog. It was updated last on January 16th!

Overall information:
  • Because we have an open ESL teaching position at this time the plan is to post on Monday (January 27) for the position, hoping to hire as soon as possible.  For Monday we will have Johnny Aguirre all day to assist Karly Nadolski who will be subbing all week to cover ESL.  Please help us help our students during this transition time.   
  • Dr. Plank presented to all of the elementary schools and Dyer staff over the course of the past two weeks regarding the process for redistricting/boundaries and staffing.  
    • Click HERE to see the presentation he shared at each of the buildings.  He will not be coming to Karcher or BHS to give the same information as the redistricting and staffing impacts K-6 families and staff. 
    • If you have any questions about anything you see in the slides, please feel free to come and talk to me about it!  
  • The district office sent out an Open Enrollment Survey this past Tuesday to all residents who have students open enrolling to other school districts.  Every district has students open enrolling in and out.  Our goal is to understand why they are enrolling out so that we can address things noted in the survey data to inform our practices and procedures.  As always, our goal in to keep our resident families and to gain nonresident students.   
  • Here is the powerpoint used during our 2 hour building level time.  Within in it you will find the links shared.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  Since we ran out of time, we will continue using PLC this Wednesday focused around our data and setting goals between now and April.  See below details for Wednesday. 
This week:  
  • Tomorrow, Monday, is the start of term 3 (second semester).  Please make sure you have your advisory students pull up their class schedule right away in the morning to know what new electives they have and to see if any of their other classes have shifted around.  
    • Knowing that our 7th grade class is a large class... we did the best we could to balance sections.  There are a few elective courses (STEM and Art) where the numbers are over 30.  We know this and please know we felt this needed to happen for some of our students.  Students that created the classes to go over 30 are supported either through ESL aide support or special education aide support (between our aides or WIN aides) to ensure Universal Access.  
  • During your team time on either this Monday or Tuesday please input grades into your standards-based gradebook.  
    • Put grades in multiple subskills and Essential Skills.  We are wanting you to then post these grades as well so that we can run a report card to see how it looks, etc.  
    • Don't forget to also put in some learning habit grades as well so we can see how that too looks on a report card.  
    • Thank you!  
  • This week is math iReady winter diagnostic testing.  Please be cognizant and mindful of the noise level in the building to ensure a great testing environment for our students.  
  • Monday, January 27 - 8th grade please bring your advisories to the auditorium ASAP after attendance and announcements.  Eric Burling will be talking to students about Freshmen year and course selections.  
    • Elective teachers, you can go after you bring them up.  Academic staff please stay in the auditorium with students.  
  • Monday, January 27 - District MTSS Committee Meeting in our Karcher library from 3:45-5:15. 
  • Tuesday, January 28 - Grades need to be posted by 3:00pm!!!  
  • Tuesday, January 28 - Special education department meeting in the small conference room from 2:40 - 3:15.  
  • Wednesday, January 29 - PLC in the library.  
    • Within our teams we will be discussing how we want to use the TDA prompts and how we will do our ACES paragraphs throughout the building (electives and Science/Social Studies) so that we are consistent with our writing in all areas.  
    • We will also discuss the use of Standards Mastery and how we want to use those questions between now and April.  
    • Our goal is to ensure we not only are focused on the standards (which you have been doing all year) but to also ensure we are providing students with practice when it comes to what they see related to the standards.  
Looking ahead:  
  • Monday, February 3 - 7th grade auditorium for course selection information during Extended Advisory.  
  • Monday, February 3 - BLT Meeting from 2:40 - 3:30.  
  • Monday, February 3 - Freshmen Open House at BHS from 5:30-7:25.  
  • Tuesday, February 4 - Strings Concert in our Karcher gym at 6:30pm
  • Wednesday, February 5 - YAR student meeting 10:20-11:20
  • Friday, February 7 - SNOCO Dance in our Karcher library from 6:30-8:30. 
    • Those interested in helping please let Stephanie Rummler know!  
_______________________________________________________
Pictures from the week
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Karcher Way - Character Assemblies!!!  Thank you all for taking the time to reflect and think about students who have truly exhibited our character traits throughout first semester.  This moment is important for all of our students to reflect on their character and reinforce the importance of continuing positive character into next semester.  That positive character is noticed and acknowledged!  










7th grade!!!

And... a little culture building for our teachers on Friday!  They were asked to take a look at some new building plans and present an "update" as if they work for Scherrer to the rest of the "Scherrer Group" in the room.  They did an amazing job!  They did let the cat out of the bag that the "maintenance penthouse" is not really for maintenance but is a spa area for staff... shhhh... don't tell the other buildings (as they shared in their presentation).  Keep calling it the "maintenance penthouse!"  

And... thank goodness we still have a "Bradly" toilet in the plans as well for Brad Ferstenou!  I am sure he is pleased to know that!  Truly, you all did a great job having fun and building some culture!  










domingo, 19 de enero de 2020

January 20, 2020

______________________________________________________________________________
Kudos
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • Thanks again to Jon Nelson for covering the office this past Monday as Steve Berezowitz, Annie Phillips, and myself attended a Threat Assessment Training at the Madison Police Department.  Always great to know the building is in good hands!  Thanks Jon.  
  • Kudos to our special education teachers for putting together Room 107.  We have never had the ability to service all of our students as we have needed to and now, as of January 13, have the ability to provide individualized instruction for some of our special education students for just one or two periods of their day up to a few hours of their day.  If you haven't walked past room 107 go take a peek as the department did a great job creating a welcoming environment for students!  
  • Kudos to Zane Bale for taking on the ACCESS testing this past week and into this week for some of our ESL students.  The ACCESS gives us some great data to analyze to ensure we service our ESL population appropriately.  Thank you Zane for the time it takes to organize and facilitate the whole process!  
  • Thank you to Jennifer Pelnar for working things through with me on some tweaks to the art spaces for the new building.  An adjustment was needed due to the requirements of our Kilns which moved things around a little bit.  Thank you Jennifer for coming up with numerous ideas to bring back to PRA to ensure the space is well thought out!  
  • Lastly, thank you to those of you who came on Wednesday regarding the 6-8 scheduling committee.  We had a great turn out from grades 6-8 and a very open discussion about the schedule.  I am confident we will land on a schedule that puts students first and provides strong opportunities for students!  Quite a few people on the scheduling committee have reached out to me asking specific questions as they work through their thoughts of the schedule.  Every question has been a great question!   It is awesome to see the excitement and commitment from all three grade levels!  
Article this week:  

Test Better, Teach Better

by W. James Popham

Chapter 1. The Links Between Testing and Teaching

What Sorts of Teaching Decisions Can Tests Help?

I've been touting the tight relationship that should be present between testing and teaching. It's time to get more specific. There are four types of teaching decisions that should rest squarely on what a teacher finds out either from the structure of the educational tests themselves or from the way students perform on educational tests.
Decisions about the nature and purpose of the curriculum. Essentially, the teacher seeks answers to questions like these: “What am I really trying to teach? What do my students need to know and be able to do? How can I translate the big curricular goals set for my students into specific, teachable components?”
Decisions about students' prior knowledge. Questions include, “What do my students already know about the topic I'm planning to teach? Are there any gaps that I need to address before we can tackle this material? Based on what my students know and can do, how can I tailor my instruction to provide the proper balance of remediation and challenge?”
Decisions about how long to teach something. Questions include, “How long do I think it will take my students to master this content? What kind of progress are they making? Are we on the right track? Should I continue teaching on my planned schedule, or are we ready to move on?”
Decisions about the effectiveness of instruction. Questions include, “Did my students learn? Was the instructional approach I took a good one? What specific activities were the most advantageous? Where do I need to make alterations?”
Now, let's take a closer look at how tests—both their design and the results of their application—can help teachers make these kinds of decisions with confidence.

Using Tests to Clarify the Curriculum

Typically, educators think of a curriculum as the set of intended outcomes that we want students to achieve. During the bulk of my teaching career, most teachers have used the phrase educational objectives to describe their curricular intentions. These days, of course, we find that most curricula are described as sets of content standards—that is, the knowledge and skills students are supposed to master as a consequence of instruction. Sometimes we see the term benchmarks used to describe the more specific skills and knowledge often subsumed beneath fairly broad content standards. The descriptors may change, but the mission of a curriculum remains constant: Its essential purpose is to lay out the stuff we want kids to learn.
Regardless of whether we call them content standards, goals, or objectives, the curricular intentions handed down by states and districts are often less clear than teachers need them to be for purposes of day-to-day instructional planning. For example, a group of elementary teachers might find themselves responsible for promoting this district-approved social studies content standard: “Students will comprehend the formal and informal nature of the interrelationships among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of U.S. government.”
Let's imagine you're one of the 5th grade teachers who is supposed to help students master this content standard. How would you go about planning your instruction? Personally, I think there's way too much fuzz on this curricular peach. Different teachers could easily read this social studies content standard and come up with quite divergent ideas of what it signifies. For example, one teacher might conclude that this content standard focuses exclusively on the formal and informal “checks and balances” when one governmental branch interacts with the other two. Another teacher might think that this content standard emphasizes the distinction between “formal” and “informal” interrelationships among the three governmental branches.
Now suppose that your 5th graders will be taking an important “standards-based” social studies achievement test at the end of the school year. If the people who built that test interpret this social studies content standard in one way, and you interpret it in another way—and teach toward your interpretation—it's almost certain that your students won't do as well on the achievement test as you, your principal, or your students' parents would like.
Clearly, if the curricular aims that a teacher must address are open to multiple interpretations, then off-the-mark instruction is likely to occur, bringing with it lower test performances. But if a curricular goal is accompanied by a set of illustrative test items indicating the ways that the goal will be measured, then teachers can analyze those items and form a far more accurate idea of the outcome that the state or district is actually seeking. Because the sample test items exemplify what the curricular intention really represents, teachers can plan and provide their students with better, more curricularly relevant instruction.
To illustrate, suppose you knew that mastery of the fairly fuzzy 5th grade social studies goal about the three branches of the U.S. government would be assessed by items similar to the following:


Sample Item 1
Which of the following three branches of U.S. government, if any, is primarily responsible for the final enactment of treaties with foreign nations?
  1. Legislative
  2. Executive
  3. Judicial
  4. No single branch is responsible.
Sample Item 2
Which, if any, of the following statements about governmental stability is true? (Mark each statement as True or False.)
  1. The enactment of term-limiting legislation at the local level has made the U.S. federal legislative branch of government more stable.
  2. The availability of the impeachment process tends to decrease the stability of the executive branch of U.S. government.
  3. Historically, the judicial branch of U.S. federal government has been the most stable.
Sample Item 3
Our founding fathers charted a meaningful series of governmental checks and balances. Focus on the area of taxation, then select two of the three branches and briefly describe the formal way(s) in which one branch can check the other. Answer in the space provided below.
__________________________________________________________

Having read these sample items, wouldn't you have a much better idea of what to teach your students in order for them to come to “comprehend the formal and informal nature of the interrelationships among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of U.S. government”? Sample Item 1 makes it clear that students will need to learn the primary responsibilities of each governmental branch. Sample Item 2 suggests that students must learn why important factors such as governmental stability are present for each branch. And Sample Item 3 indicates that, as the content standard said, students will need to understand the “formal and informal nature of the relationships” among the governmental branches. For this item, as you can see, the focus is on formal. In another item, you can reasonably assume, the focus might be on informal. Moreover, Sample Item 3 tips you off that students may need to display this understanding by constructing their own responses, rather than merely selecting a response from a set of options.
I believe that elementary teachers who consider these three illustrative items along with the original statement of the content standard are going to have a far more lucid idea of what the content standard actually means. Consequently, they'll be able to deliver instruction that is more on-target and more effective.
The payoffs from test-triggered clarity about curriculum goals can apply with equal force to a teacher's own, personally chosen curricular aspirations. If teachers are pursuing curricular aims of their own choosing, but those aims are less clear (in a teacher's mind) than is desirable for instructional planning purposes, then teachers are likely to come up with less relevant instruction. To illustrate, when I was a first-year teacher, I wanted the students in my two English classes “to be better writers.” But even though that very general goal was in my mind as the school year got under way, I really had no idea of what it meant for my students to be “better writers.” As the months went by, I occasionally had my students write a practice essay. However, for their final exam, I had them answer multiple-choice items about the mechanics of writing. Shame on me!
The task of creating a few sample assessment items can bring the desired outcomes into focus. In short, test-exemplified curricular goals will almost always be better promoted instructionally than will unexemplified curricular goals. Because of the significance of tests in helping teachers clarify their instructional targets, I'm going to dig into this topic a bit more deeply in Chapter 2. Stay tuned.
______________________________________________________________________________
Information/Reminders
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


New Construction Information 
  • To separate out information just pertaining to the new middle school I put together a blog just for the 6-8 KMS building!
  • Click HERE to access the new building blog. I will add information here when things come up and will always have the link here in the blog for all of you! It is also on the Karcher Calendar :)))
This week:
  • This week is the last few days of term 2!!!
  • This week is the start of our winter iReady diagnostic in ELA.  
    • Please be mindful of testing and assist with keeping the halls and classrooms by ELA quieter for a better testing environment.  
  • Monday, January 20 - Special Education Aide meeting from 2:40 - 3:00 in the large conference room.  
    • Our special education teachers want to go over aide schedules prior to the start of semester 2 as some adjustments are taking place, especially with the switch of electives for semester 2.  
  • Monday, January 20 - Essential Skills Committee Meeting in our Karcher library starting at 3:45 - 5:15.  
    • Our focus this time is on creating an aligned 4K-12 nonacademic behavior rubric so we are aligned with common language.  
  • If you have not filled out your 2 Character Awards please get those done prior to Tuesday.  
    • Here (Karcher Way Assemblies) is the document Brad Ferstenou shared to ensure we do not have overlap of students picked.  Put what you are saying on the back please - these mean a lot to students so everyone needs to be prepared and ready!  
  • Tuesday, January 21 - Karcher Way 8th Grade Assembly.  
    • Please bring your advisories up to the auditorium as soon as you have your attendance and announcements done.  We will not make announcements to come up.  Please come as soon as you can so we can get started.  
  • Wednesday, January 22 - Karcher Way 7th Grade Assembly 
    • Same as 8th grade... bring advisories right after attendance and announcements!  
  • Wednesday, January 22 - PLC this week will be in the library.  We will be tweaking and taking a look at our Essential Skills at a Glance.  Please bring your computers!
  •  Thursday, January 23 - End of term 2!!!  
    • 7th grade incentive during extended advisory. 
  • Friday, January 24 - 8:00 - 4:00 Inservice Day
    • 8:00 - 9:00 - BHS Auditorium for longevity awards and a message from Dr. Plank. 
      • This inservice day is for certified staff only.  
      • If you are a non-certified staff member and you are being recognized for your years of service then you are encouraged to attend the 8:00 - 9:00 longevity awards in the BHS auditorium.  
    • 9:30 - 11:30 - Building Level Inservice time - please come to the library with your computers!  We will be focusing on three things:  
      • Culture Building
      • Karcher Data 
      • Standards Based Gradebook. 
      • Standards Mastery - iReady 
    • 11:30 - 12:30 - Lunch on your own.  
      • Those on the scheduling committee we will be meeting from 11:30 - 12:30 in the library as a working lunch.  Lunch will be provided from Subway.  
      • We will probably start at 11:40 to give Dyer staff time to arrive.  So know you will have a 10 minute break between Building Level and the Scheduling Committee.   
    • 12:30 - 4:00 - Teacher work time.  This is a great time to get your grades done for semester 2 as grades need to be posted by Tuesday, January 28 by 3:00pm.  Also, start thinking about your SLO and PPGs as they will be due by March 3.  You will have teacher work time in the afternoon again on February 28 as another time to potentially use for your SLO and PPG.  
Looking ahead:  

  • Math iReady diagnostic testing week.  
  • Monday, January 27 - All 8th grade advisories please bring your advisory group to the auditorium right after announcements.  
    • Eric Burling will be coming to talk about Freshmen year course selection booklets.  Steve Berezowitz will then be taking students from ALL to work through the selection of classes process.  
  • Monday, January 27 - MTSS District Committee Meeting in our Karcher library from 3:45 - 5:15.  
  • Tuesday, January 28 - Grades are due by 3:00pm for term 2.  
  • Monday, February 3 - 7th grade in auditorium during extended advisory for course selection information.  
  • Monday, February 3 - BLT Meeting
  • Monday, February 3 - Freshmen Open House at BHS from 5:30 - 7:25.  
  • Tuesday, February 4 - Strings Concert in our Karcher gym starting at 6:30pm.  
  • Friday, February 7 - SNOCO Dance from 6:30 - 8:30.  
    • Please let Stephanie Rummler know if you are able to assist!  

______________________________________________________________________________
Pictures from the week
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Boys Basketball!  The last game of the season is this Monday!  

Cheer Club at the boys basketball game!